You’ve done the hard part—spent decades saving, investing, and planning for retirement. Now comes the big question: How much can I safely withdraw from my savings each year without running out of money?
It’s a question every retiree faces, and the fear of miscalculating can be paralyzing. Withdraw too little, and you risk living frugally when you could be enjoying your golden years. Withdraw too much, and you might find yourself running out of funds when you need them most.
Enter the 4% Rule—one of the most widely recognized strategies for managing retirement withdrawals. Developed as a guideline for financial stability, the 4% Rule offers retirees a framework for balancing their annual spending with the long-term sustainability of their savings.
But is it still relevant in today’s economic landscape? With market volatility, inflation concerns, and increasing life expectancies, many are wondering if this golden rule of retirement planning still holds up.
In this post, we’ll break down:
The origins of the 4% Rule and the research behind it.
How it works and the assumptions it relies on.
Its limitations and where it might fall short in today’s financial environment.
Alternative strategies and practical adjustments to make it work for your unique situation.
Whether you’re planning for retirement or already enjoying it, understanding the 4% Rule can provide the clarity and confidence you need to manage your savings wisely.
Let’s dive in.
What is the 4% Rule?
When it comes to retirement planning, the 4% Rule is one of the most well-known and widely discussed strategies. But where did it come from, and why has it stood the test of time?
Origins of the 4% Rule
The 4% Rule was introduced in 1994 by financial advisor William Bengen. Armed with decades of historical market data, Bengen wanted to answer a critical question: How much can retirees safely withdraw from their savings each year without running out of money over a 30-year retirement period?
Through his research, Bengen discovered that retirees could withdraw 4% of their retirement savings in their first year, adjust that amount annually for inflation, and still have a high probability of their savings lasting for 30 years.
The Core Principle Explained
At its heart, the 4% Rule is surprisingly simple:
Year One: Withdraw 4% of your total retirement savings.
Example: If you’ve saved $1 million, you’d withdraw $40,000 in your first year of retirement.
Adjust for Inflation: In subsequent years, increase your withdrawal amount based on the annual inflation rate to maintain your purchasing power.
Example: If inflation is 2% in year two, your withdrawal increases to $40,800.
This strategy is designed to balance two key goals:
Providing a steady income stream for retirees.
Ensuring the sustainability of savings over a 30-year retirement period.
Historical Context: Tested Across Market Cycles
Bengen’s analysis wasn’t based on guesswork—it was grounded in historical data spanning some of the most challenging economic periods in U.S. history, including:
The Great Depression
Periods of high inflation in the 1970s
Several stock market crashes
He tested the rule against data from 1926 to 1976, examining how a balanced portfolio of 50% stocks and 50% bonds would have performed in various economic conditions.
The result? Even during periods of severe market downturns and inflation spikes, retirees who followed the 4% Rule consistently avoided running out of money within a 30-year retirement span.
The 4% Rule isn’t a magic bullet, but it has proven to be a reliable starting point for retirement planning. However, it’s important to remember that the rule is based on specific assumptions and historical conditions—and modern realities might require some adjustments.
In the next section, we’ll dive into how the 4% Rule works in practice and explore the assumptions behind this classic retirement guideline.
How the 4% Rule Works
The 4% Rule is praised for its simplicity, but its effectiveness relies on a few key steps and assumptions. Let’s break it down step by step.
Step 1: Initial Withdrawal
The 4% Rule starts with a straightforward calculation:
In your first year of retirement, you withdraw 4% of your total retirement savings.
This withdrawal is intended to cover your annual living expenses and ensure financial sustainability for approximately 30 years.
Example:
Retirement Savings: $1,000,000
Year 1 Withdrawal: 4% x $1,000,000 = $40,000
This initial withdrawal becomes the baseline for future adjustments.
Step 2: Annual Adjustments for Inflation
Inflation erodes purchasing power over time, which means a fixed $40,000 withdrawal won’t stretch as far in 10 or 20 years. That’s why the 4% Rule includes annual adjustments based on inflation rates.
Each year, your withdrawal amount is increased to match inflation.
Inflation rates are typically measured using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Example:
Year 1 Withdrawal: $40,000
Inflation Rate: 2%
Year 2 Withdrawal: $40,000 x 1.02 = $40,800
These annual adjustments help maintain your standard of living throughout retirement.
Step 3: Key Assumptions
The 4% Rule relies on several important assumptions that shaped William Bengen’s original research:
A Balanced Portfolio:
Your retirement savings are split roughly into 50% equities (stocks) and 50% fixed-income assets (bonds).
This balance aims to capture long-term stock market growth while maintaining stability through bonds.
Tax-Deferred Accounts:
The model assumes that withdrawals are taken from tax-advantaged accounts, such as IRAs or 401(k)s.
Taxes on these withdrawals are deferred until funds are taken out, which helps maximize growth during accumulation years.
30-Year Retirement Horizon:
The rule assumes a retirement period of about 30 years, which aligns with a traditional retirement age of 65 and an expected lifespan into the mid-90s.
Historical Market Conditions:
The strategy was tested using historical data spanning various market booms and crashes.
While historical trends are a helpful guide, they don’t guarantee future performance.
Why These Steps and Assumptions Matter
The 4% Rule isn’t just about pulling out 4% each year—it’s about maintaining consistency and discipline in withdrawals, while staying aligned with a balanced, long-term investment strategy.
However, these assumptions also highlight some potential challenges:
Market Volatility: If the market experiences significant downturns early in retirement, your savings could be depleted faster.
Inflation Rates: Periods of high inflation can erode your purchasing power more rapidly than expected.
Retirement Length: If you live longer than 30 years, additional adjustments might be necessary.
In the next section, we’ll dive into these assumptions and limitations more deeply to explore where the 4% Rule might need tweaking in today’s financial landscape.
Key Considerations and Limitations of the 4% Rule
While the 4% Rule remains one of the most widely recognized retirement withdrawal strategies, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. The rule was developed based on historical data and specific assumptions, but modern financial realities introduce new challenges that retirees must consider.
Market Conditions: The Economic Wild Card
When William Bengen developed the 4% Rule, the financial environment was different from what we face today.
Low Interest Rates: Historically low interest rates in bonds and savings accounts have reduced the reliable income retirees used to earn from fixed-income assets.
Stock Market Volatility: Market downturns, especially in the early years of retirement, can drastically reduce the value of a portfolio and make the 4% withdrawal rate less sustainable.
High Inflation: Rising inflation means retirees need to withdraw more money each year to maintain their purchasing power, placing additional stress on their savings.
Real Impact Example:A retiree withdrawing $40,000 annually in an environment with 7% inflation will need nearly $42,800 the next year just to maintain the same standard of living—a far cry from the modest 2–3% inflation rates historically assumed by the 4% Rule.
In today’s economic climate, some experts suggest that a 3% withdrawal rate might be more realistic for new retirees.
Life Expectancy & Retirement Age: Longevity Risk
When the 4% Rule was created, a 30-year retirement horizon was the standard assumption. But today:
People are living longer, with many retirees expecting to live well into their 90s.
Early retirements, such as those driven by the Financial Independence, Retire Early (FIRE) movement, mean some individuals could be drawing from their savings for 40 years or more.
If you retire earlier or anticipate a longer life expectancy, you may need to:
Lower your withdrawal rate to 3% or even 2.5%.
Increase exposure to growth-oriented investments to ensure your portfolio keeps up with withdrawals.
Portfolio Diversification & Tax Status: The Silent Influencers
The sustainability of the 4% Rule also relies heavily on portfolio composition and tax strategy—two factors often overlooked by retirees.
Diversification Matters: A balanced mix of stocks and bonds (50/50 split) is a core assumption of the rule. A poorly diversified portfolio—overloaded in risky assets or overly conservative—can reduce long-term sustainability.
Tax-Deferred vs. Taxable Accounts: Withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts like IRAs or 401(k)s are taxed as regular income, which impacts your net withdrawal. Conversely, withdrawing from a Roth IRA or taxable brokerage account may have different tax implications.
Strategy Tip: A well-planned withdrawal strategy often blends different account types to minimize taxes and maximize long-term sustainability.
Inflation & Market Volatility: The Double Threat
Two of the biggest risks to any retirement withdrawal strategy are inflation and early market downturns:
Sequence of Returns Risk: If a retiree withdraws funds during a market downturn early in retirement, their savings could be depleted much faster.
Persistent Inflation: Rising costs for healthcare, housing, and basic necessities mean retirees may need to withdraw larger amounts every year.
Example Scenario:
A retiree withdrawing $40,000 annually may need $50,000 in just a few years if inflation remains consistently high.
If this coincides with a major market crash, the portfolio might struggle to recover, accelerating depletion.
So, Does the 4% Rule Still Work?
The 4% Rule is a useful baseline, but it’s not set in stone. Retirees today must remain flexible, considering:
Current market conditions.
Life expectancy.
Portfolio diversification.
Inflation trends.
For some, a 3% withdrawal rate might offer greater peace of mind, while others with higher-risk portfolios might be comfortable with 5% withdrawals under certain conditions.
In the next section, we’ll explore alternative withdrawal strategies and how they compare to the traditional 4% Rule.
Alternative Withdrawal Rates
While the 4% Rule has long been a standard guideline for retirement withdrawals, it’s not the only approach. Depending on market conditions, personal risk tolerance, and individual circumstances, retirees might consider adjusting their withdrawal rates. Let’s explore two common alternatives: the 3% rate for conservative planning and the 5% rate for more aggressive spending.
The 3% Withdrawal Rate: Playing It Safe
In today’s economic climate—marked by market volatility, low bond yields, and rising inflation—some financial experts argue that a 3% withdrawal rate is a safer choice for retirees.
Why Consider a 3% Rate?
Lower Market Returns: Projections suggest that future market returns may not match historical averages.
Longer Lifespans: With people living longer, a 3% rate offers a better chance of stretching savings over 35–40 years.
Reduced Risk in Downturns: A lower withdrawal rate minimizes the risk of depleting your savings during early retirement market crashes.
Example Scenario:
Retirement Savings: $1,000,000
Withdrawal at 3%: $30,000 per year (adjusted annually for inflation)
The Trade-Off: While the 3% rate enhances long-term sustainability, it also means a tighter retirement budget. Retirees relying on this approach might need to be more disciplined with their spending or supplement their income through part-time work or passive income streams.
The 5% Withdrawal Rate: Living More Comfortably (With Higher Risk)
At the other end of the spectrum, a 5% withdrawal rate can provide retirees with more financial freedom in their early years of retirement.
Why Consider a 5% Rate?
Higher Initial Income: Withdrawing 5% instead of 4% means an immediate boost in annual income.
Early Retirement Goals: Ideal for retirees who want to enjoy more spending freedom in their earlier, more active retirement years.
Strong Market Confidence: This strategy assumes a robust investment portfolio with higher growth potential.
Example Scenario:
Retirement Savings: $1,000,000
Withdrawal at 5%: $50,000 per year (adjusted annually for inflation)
The Trade-Off: A 5% withdrawal rate comes with increased risk. If the market experiences a significant downturn early in retirement, retirees may face portfolio depletion sooner than expected. This approach is better suited for those with:
A shorter retirement horizon.
A higher risk tolerance.
Other income sources (e.g., rental income, pensions).
Flexibility is Key: Adjusting to Your Unique Circumstances
The reality is, withdrawal rates aren’t static. A rigid approach can leave money on the table during good years or put too much strain on your portfolio during downturns.
Why Flexibility Matters:
Market Performance: In strong market years, you might withdraw slightly more; in weaker years, you might tighten spending.
Personal Needs: Early retirement might come with higher expenses (e.g., travel, healthcare), while later years may require less spending.
Unexpected Costs: Medical emergencies or home repairs can alter your financial landscape.
Dynamic Withdrawal Strategies:Some retirees adopt flexible strategies, such as:
Guardrails Approach: Adjust withdrawals based on portfolio performance (withdraw less during downturns and slightly more during strong years).
Spending Buckets: Segment savings into short-term (cash), medium-term (bonds), and long-term (stocks) accounts to balance risk and liquidity.
Annual Reviews: Reassess your withdrawal strategy annually to ensure it still aligns with your portfolio performance and life circumstances.
Which Withdrawal Rate is Right for You?
3% Rate: Best for cautious retirees focused on long-term sustainability.
4% Rate: A balanced choice for many retirees with moderate risk tolerance.
5% Rate: Suitable for retirees with higher risk tolerance or supplemental income sources.
In retirement, flexibility is your greatest ally. The right withdrawal strategy isn’t set in stone—it evolves with your needs, the market, and your goals.
In the next section, we’ll look at how to practically apply these strategies and adjust them to your unique retirement plan.
Real-Life Application: Adjusting the 4% Rule for Your Retirement
While the 4% Rule offers a solid baseline for retirement withdrawals, life doesn’t follow a strict formula. Your spending needs, market conditions, and personal circumstances will naturally change over time. The key to making the 4% Rule work for you lies in understanding spending phases, adopting dynamic withdrawals, and adjusting your plan as needed.
Spending Phases: Retirement Isn’t Linear
Retirement spending isn’t a straight line—it typically changes as you move through different stages of life.
Early Retirement (Active Years):
These are often your most active years.
You might spend more on travel, hobbies, and lifestyle experiences.
Healthcare costs are usually lower during this phase.
Mid-Retirement (Settling In):
Spending may level out as you travel less and settle into a routine.
Healthcare costs might start to rise, but other expenses (e.g., housing, travel) may decline.
Late Retirement (Healthcare-Heavy Phase):
Spending patterns may shift significantly due to increased healthcare and long-term care costs.
Discretionary spending (e.g., travel, dining out) often decreases.
Example:
Early Years: $50,000 per year (higher discretionary spending).
Mid Years: $45,000 per year (steady spending with slight reductions).
Late Years: $55,000 per year (increased healthcare costs).
Planning for these phases helps retirees anticipate changes and adjust their withdrawal strategies accordingly.
Dynamic Withdrawals: Adjusting Based on Real-Life Conditions
The 4% Rule assumes a static withdrawal pattern, but real life rarely follows static rules. Dynamic withdrawal strategies allow you to adjust withdrawals based on two key factors:
Market Performance: If your portfolio is thriving in a bull market, you might withdraw slightly more. In a bear market, you might tighten spending temporarily to protect your principal.
Personal Needs: Unexpected medical expenses, home repairs, or major family needs might require higher withdrawals in certain years.
Dynamic Withdrawal Strategies Include:
The Guardrails Approach: Withdrawals increase slightly in good years and decrease in bad years, with predefined “guardrails” in place.
Floor and Ceiling Method: Set a minimum (floor) and maximum (ceiling) withdrawal range to allow flexibility without risking overspending or underspending.
Bucket Strategy: Divide retirement savings into “buckets” for short-term (cash), medium-term (bonds), and long-term (stocks) needs. Draw from cash during down markets to avoid selling investments at a loss.
Example Guardrail Strategy:
Portfolio Value Increases by 20% → Withdraw an extra 1%.
Portfolio Value Decreases by 20% → Reduce withdrawals by 1%.
This approach allows retirees to adapt to market realities without jeopardizing long-term sustainability.
Case Example: A 30-Year Retirement Journey
Let’s walk through a simplified example of a retiree adjusting their withdrawal strategy over a 30-year retirement.
Meet Alex:
Retirement Savings: $1,000,000
Initial Withdrawal: 4% ($40,000)
Years 1–10 (Early Retirement):
Alex starts with the standard 4% withdrawal and adjusts for inflation annually.
Market Performance: Strong bull market.
Adjustment: Alex allows a slight increase in withdrawals for discretionary travel spending.
Years 11–20 (Mid-Retirement):
Market Performance: Mild downturn in Year 12.
Adjustment: Alex temporarily reduces withdrawals by 10% during the downturn.
Spending Shifts: Less travel, more focus on stable living costs.
Years 21–30 (Late Retirement):
Market Performance: Steady recovery.
Adjustment: Withdrawals increase slightly to cover rising healthcare costs.
Spending Priorities: Focus shifts away from discretionary expenses to healthcare and daily living.
Outcome:
Alex’s withdrawals adapted to market performance and personal needs.
By reducing withdrawals during downturns and increasing them strategically, Alex’s portfolio remained resilient throughout retirement.
The Key Takeaway:
The 4% Rule isn’t a rigid formula—it’s a flexible guideline. By understanding spending phases, adopting dynamic withdrawal strategies, and remaining adaptable, retirees can balance enjoying their retirement years with protecting their financial future.
In the next section, we’ll explore when the 4% Rule might fall short and situations where it may need significant adjustments.
When the 4% Rule Might Not Work
While the 4% Rule is a useful baseline for retirement planning, it’s not a universal solution. Certain scenarios can expose its limitations, making it less reliable or even unsustainable. Let’s explore the key situations where retirees might need to rethink or adjust their withdrawal strategy.
Early Retirement Scenarios: Outliving Your Savings
Retiring in your 50s or earlier introduces a significant challenge: your retirement funds need to last longer—potentially 40 years or more instead of the traditional 30-year horizon assumed by the 4% Rule.
Why Early Retirement Poses a Risk:
Longer Time Horizon: More years of withdrawals mean more exposure to market downturns, inflation, and sequence-of-returns risk.
Increased Healthcare Costs: Retirees under 65 may not have access to Medicare, leading to higher out-of-pocket healthcare expenses.
Market Volatility: Early retirees are more vulnerable to stock market downturns in the first decade of withdrawals, which can have long-lasting effects on portfolio sustainability.
Adjustment Strategy:
Lower the withdrawal rate to 3% or 3.5% to reduce the risk of depleting funds too soon.
Plan for part-time work or alternative income streams in the early retirement years.
Example:A retiree with $1,000,000 retiring at age 50 might reduce their withdrawal rate to 3% ($30,000 annually) to extend the life of their savings.
Periods of High Inflation: The Silent Wealth Eroder
Inflation is one of the most underestimated threats to retirement planning, and its effects compound over time. The 4% Rule assumes a moderate inflation rate (historically around 2–3%), but prolonged periods of high inflation can significantly erode purchasing power.
Why Inflation Disrupts the 4% Rule:
Withdrawal amounts must increase annually to keep up with inflation, leading to larger withdrawals from the portfolio.
Essential expenses like healthcare, housing, and food often outpace general inflation rates, creating added pressure.
Bonds, a key component of the assumed 50/50 portfolio, often underperform during inflationary periods.
Adjustment Strategy:
Adopt a flexible withdrawal strategy that adjusts spending during high-inflation years.
Include inflation-protected assets like Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) in the portfolio.
Avoid locking in long-term fixed withdrawals without accounting for inflation risk.
Example: If inflation spikes to 7% per year, a retiree withdrawing $40,000 annually would need $42,800 in Year 2. Over 10 years, the withdrawal requirement could exceed $70,000 annually.
Individual Variability: No One-Size-Fits-All Strategy
Every retiree’s financial situation is unique. Personal circumstances, health, family obligations, and spending habits all play a role in determining whether the 4% Rule will hold up.
Factors That Can Disrupt the 4% Rule:
Healthcare Costs: Unexpected medical expenses, long-term care, or expensive prescriptions can drain retirement savings faster than planned.
Family Responsibilities: Supporting aging parents, helping children with education costs, or unforeseen financial burdens can create unplanned withdrawals.
Lifestyle Choices: Expensive hobbies, frequent travel, or relocating to high-cost-of-living areas can skew withdrawal needs.
Adjustment Strategy:
Plan for variable spending needs rather than assuming consistent annual expenses.
Keep a financial buffer or contingency fund to cover unexpected costs without dipping into investment principal.
Revisit and adjust your withdrawal strategy annually based on life changes.
Example:A retiree might plan for higher withdrawals in the first 10 years to cover travel and lifestyle expenses but reduce spending in later years to focus on essential costs.
The Bottom Line:
The 4% Rule is a guideline, not a guarantee. Retirees facing early retirement, prolonged inflation, or significant personal variability must remain flexible and adaptable in their approach.
While the 4% Rule offers a reliable foundation for most retirement plans, success ultimately depends on your ability to adjust withdrawals, manage risk, and plan for unexpected expenses.
In the next section, we’ll discuss how financial advisors can help refine and personalize the 4% Rule to fit your unique needs.
The Role of Financial Advisors in Retirement Planning
Retirement planning isn’t a one-time task—it’s an ongoing process that requires careful monitoring, strategic adjustments, and the ability to adapt to changing financial and personal circumstances. While the 4% Rule offers a helpful starting point, successfully applying it over decades often requires expert guidance and oversight.
Why Expert Advice Matters
Retirement withdrawals are more complex than simply withdrawing a set percentage every year. A variety of factors can influence the sustainability of your savings:
Market Volatility: How do you adjust your withdrawals during a bear market?
Tax Efficiency: Which accounts should you withdraw from first to minimize your tax burden?
Inflation Adjustments: How do you ensure withdrawals keep pace with rising costs without depleting savings too quickly?
These aren’t one-size-fits-all questions, and small missteps can have significant long-term consequences. A financial advisor brings expertise, objectivity, and a data-driven approach to navigate these challenges effectively.
Advisors help answer critical questions like:
Should I adjust my withdrawal rate this year based on market performance?
How can I balance withdrawals between taxable and tax-advantaged accounts?
What’s the best strategy to manage healthcare and long-term care costs?
The right advisor doesn’t just offer answers—they provide clarity and confidence in your financial decisions.
Tailored Strategies for Unique Goals
Your retirement is unique. Your withdrawal strategy should be, too.
A financial advisor tailors your withdrawal plan based on:
Your Retirement Goals: Are you planning to travel extensively, leave a legacy, or focus on healthcare needs?
Risk Tolerance: Are you comfortable with market fluctuations, or do you prefer more predictable income streams?
Account Types: Do you have a mix of taxable, tax-deferred (e.g., IRAs, 401(k)s), and tax-free (e.g., Roth IRAs) accounts?
Example of a Tailored Approach:
Withdraw from taxable brokerage accounts first to minimize taxable income early in retirement.
Use Roth IRA withdrawals in high-tax years to manage tax brackets effectively.
Maintain a cash reserve to cover withdrawals during market downturns without selling investments at a loss.
An advisor builds these nuances into your plan, ensuring every decision aligns with your unique financial fingerprint.
Adjusting Over Time: The Importance of Regular Check-Ins
Retirement isn’t static. Your financial needs, market conditions, and even personal goals will evolve over time.
A financial advisor serves as your financial co-pilot, helping you make regular adjustments to stay on track:
Market Adjustments: When markets dip, an advisor can recommend temporary spending cuts or reallocating assets to reduce risk.
Life Changes: Major events like healthcare issues, family emergencies, or windfalls require strategic financial responses.
Policy and Tax Law Changes: Tax codes evolve, and an advisor ensures you’re always taking advantage of current laws and incentives.
Example Scenario:
Year 1–5: Withdrawals are adjusted higher to fund travel and bucket-list activities.
Year 6–15: Spending stabilizes, and portfolio rebalancing focuses on reducing market risk.
Year 16+: Healthcare costs rise, and withdrawals shift toward covering essential expenses.
These regular reviews and adjustments ensure your withdrawal strategy remains aligned with your reality, not just the assumptions made when you first retired.
The Bottom Line:
While the 4% Rule provides a solid foundation, real financial security comes from strategic adjustments and ongoing oversight.
A skilled financial advisor doesn’t just offer investment advice—they provide:
Proactive Planning: Anticipating changes before they become problems.
Clear Guidance: Simplifying complex financial decisions.
Peace of Mind: Knowing your retirement plan is built for resilience and adaptability.
In the final section, we’ll wrap up with key takeaways and actionable steps to help you approach retirement withdrawals with confidence.
Conclusion
Planning for retirement is one of the most significant financial challenges most people will face. The 4% Rule has served as a valuable guideline for decades, offering retirees a straightforward strategy to manage withdrawals and ensure their savings last.
Let’s recap the key takeaways:
What is the 4% Rule? A guideline suggesting retirees can withdraw 4% of their savings in the first year of retirement, adjusting annually for inflation, to sustain a 30-year retirement period.
How Does It Work? The rule relies on a balanced portfolio (50% stocks, 50% bonds) and assumes annual adjustments for inflation.
Key Limitations: Modern challenges—like longer life expectancies, market volatility, and high inflation—mean the rule might need adjustments to stay relevant.
Alternative Withdrawal Rates: A 3% withdrawal rate offers a safer approach in uncertain markets, while a 5% rate prioritizes more immediate spending flexibility.
Flexibility is Essential: Spending needs often change across retirement phases, requiring dynamic withdrawal strategies tailored to personal circumstances.
The Role of Financial Advisors: Professional advisors can refine, adjust, and optimize withdrawal plans over time, ensuring they align with evolving market conditions and life changes.
While the 4% Rule remains a valuable starting point, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Retirement planning is deeply personal, shaped by your unique goals, risk tolerance, and financial situation.
If you’re approaching retirement—or already navigating it—now is the time to assess your withdrawal strategy. Consider the nuances we’ve discussed, and if you’re unsure where to start, consult a financial advisor who can build a personalized plan tailored to your needs.
Retirement isn’t just about making your savings last—it’s about enjoying financial security and peace of mind throughout your golden years.
Your retirement plan deserves more than guesswork. Take the time to build a strategy that works for you—and let your hard-earned savings support the life you’ve been planning for.
Comentarios